{"id":"exec-stakeholder-map-power-interest-table","audience":"consultants","category":"leadership-work","track":"leadership","level":"advanced","technique":"grounding","title":"Map stakeholders by influence and stance using only interview facts","free":false,"task":"Build a stakeholder map for the ERP rollout as a markdown table with columns Stakeholder, Influence (high/medium/low), Stance (supports/neutral/resists/unknown), Evidence, Next move. One row per person named in the notes, using \"unknown\" when the notes give no evidence of stance. The Evidence cell must quote the fact from the notes in under 12 words. Do not infer motives.","materialLabel":"Interview notes (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"ERP rollout - interview notes (Oct)\n\n- Dana Whitfield, CFO (sponsor): approved budget of $2.1M; said \"this must land by June\".\n- Marcus Oyelaran, VP Operations: runs the 3 plants that will use the system. In the interview he said the plants cannot lose more than 2 days of production for training. Did not say whether he supports the project.\n- Elise Ng, IT Director: owns integration; asked for 6 more months than planned; she said the timeline \"is not realistic.\"\n- Pablo Ruiz, Plant manager (Plant 2): has not been interviewed yet. Marcus mentioned he is \"concerned\" without giving detail.\n- Hye-jin Park, Controller: wants the system; said \"I've been asking for this for three years.\"\n- The CEO attended the kickoff but has not been interviewed. No stated view.\n\nNot in scope: the union representative (not part of this project).","rules":[{"type":"maxWords","max":270}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Guessing stance","why":"The AI marks Marcus as resists because of the training limit.","fix":"Say: \"Use 'unknown' unless the notes state the stance.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"Inventing motives","why":"The AI writes 'afraid of change'.","fix":"Say: \"Do not infer motives; quote facts.\"","checks":["r2"]},{"title":"Including out-of-scope people","why":"The AI adds the union rep.","fix":"Say: \"One row per person named, except out-of-scope.\"","checks":["r0"]},{"title":"Wrong table","why":"The AI drops the Next move column.","fix":"Say: \"Five columns exactly.\"","checks":["r0"]},{"title":"Trusting the AI to count words","why":"AI is bad at counting. Ask for a total word limit and it often lands over it.","fix":"Cap each cell: \"each cell under 12 words.\"","checks":["maxWords"]},{"title":"Trusting the AI to count words","why":"AI is bad at counting. Ask for a total word limit and it often lands over it.","fix":"Cap each part instead, for example: \"each line under 12 words.\"","checks":["maxWords"]}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Columns","patterns":["stakeholder","influence","stance","evidence","next move"]},{"label":"Unknown","patterns":["unknown"]},{"label":"Evidence","patterns":["evidence","quote","fact"]},{"label":"No motives","patterns":["motive","infer","don'?t guess"]},{"label":"Scope","patterns":["out of scope","one row per"]}],"hint":"List the five columns, the allowed stance values, and ban guessing about motives.","rubricLabels":["The output is a markdown table with the five specified columns and one row for each of Dana, Marcus, Elise, Pablo, Hye-jin and the CEO, with no row for the union representative","Stance is supports for Dana and Hye-jin, resists for Elise's timeline objection or neutral-unknown as justified, and unknown for Marcus, Pablo and the CEO where the notes give no stance","Every Evidence cell quotes or restates a fact from the notes in under 12 words, and the table does not claim motives such as politics or fear of change"]}