{"id":"fpa-quota-capacity-coverage-lines","audience":"fpa","category":"finance-work","track":"finance","technique":"verification","level":"intermediate","title":"Compare ramp-adjusted sales capacity with the bookings target","free":false,"task":"You're checking whether the sales team's capacity covers next year's target. Write a prompt for plain text with lines starting \"Ramped capacity:\", \"Ramping capacity:\", \"Total capacity:\", \"Coverage:\" and \"Gap:\", each with the math. Ramping reps count at 50% of a full quota. Don't mention attrition or hiring more reps. Under 80 words. No bullets or numbering.","materialLabel":"Rep counts, quota and target (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"SALES CAPACITY INPUTS - FY27, Orchard Analytics\n\nReps: 10 total. 8 are fully ramped; 2 joined in October and are still ramping.\nFull annual quota per ramped rep: $500,000.\nRamping reps are counted at 50% of full quota for FY27 capacity.\nFY27 new-business bookings target: $5,000,000.\n\nMethod: capacity = reps x quota (x 50% for ramping reps). Coverage = total capacity / target. Gap = target - total capacity.\n\nNotes: the VP of Sales is worried that two reps may leave, and wants to hire three more. Those are not part of the current headcount capacity. Hiring and attrition scenarios are for a separate analysis.","rules":[{"type":"plainText"},{"type":"maxWords","max":80},{"type":"maxBullets","max":0}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Names the five lines","patterns":["ramped capacity","ramping capacity","total capacity","coverage","gap"]},{"label":"Gives the 50% rule","patterns":["50%"]},{"label":"Gives the formulas","patterns":["/ target","target minus"]},{"label":"Bans attrition and hiring","patterns":["(do not|don'?t).*(attrition|hiring)"]},{"label":"Caps length","patterns":["\\d+\\s*words","plain"]}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Counting ramping reps at full quota","why":"The AI uses 10 x $500,000 and shows 100% coverage.","fix":"Say: \"Ramping reps count at 50% of full quota.\"","checks":["r0","r1"]},{"title":"Mentioning attrition or hiring","why":"The AI adds a risk note about reps leaving.","fix":"Add: \"Do not mention attrition, reps leaving or hiring.\"","checks":["r2"]},{"title":"Coverage in the wrong direction","why":"The AI computes target / capacity.","fix":"Add: \"Coverage = total capacity / target.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"Markdown extras","why":"The AI adds bold labels, headings and a closing note.","fix":"Say: \"Plain text, no bold. Output only the lines asked for.\"","checks":["plainText","maxBullets"]},{"title":"Trusting the AI to count words","why":"AI is bad at counting and runs past word limits.","fix":"Ask for fewer words than the real cap and keep each line short.","checks":["maxWords"]}],"hint":"Capacity counts ramping reps at half. Give that rule, the formulas and the bans.","rubricLabels":["The lines starting \"Ramped capacity:\" and \"Ramping capacity:\" show 8 x $500,000 = $4,000,000 and 2 x $500,000 x 50% = $500,000","The line starting \"Total capacity:\" shows $4,000,000 + $500,000 = $4,500,000 and \"Coverage:\" shows $4,500,000 / $5,000,000 = 90.0%","The line starting \"Gap:\" shows $5,000,000 - $4,500,000 = $500,000, and the output never mentions attrition, reps leaving or hiring more reps"]}