{"id":"hr-concern-chronology-dated-facts-table","audience":"hr","category":"people-work","track":"people","level":"advanced","technique":"format","title":"Build a neutral chronology table from messy notes","free":false,"task":"Build a chronology from the notes as a table with the header Date | Event | Source. Include only events that have a date. Sort by date, earliest first. Event is one neutral sentence under 15 words with no judgments, labels or conclusions. Source is exactly one of: Reporter, Manager, Email. After the table add one line: Undated items: followed by the number of items in the notes that have no date. Plain text. HR reviews; this is not a finding.","materialLabel":"Intake notes from an HR partner (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"Matter notes (HR partner Nikhil Rao). Reporter: Jorge Mena, Warehouse Associate. Manager: Dale Hobbs.\n- Sep 14: Jorge asked Dale by email for a schedule change (email dated Sep 14).\n- Sep 22: Jorge says Dale told him \"we'll see\" in person (reporter's account).\n- Oct 6: Jorge's shift schedule for the week of Oct 12 was posted; it showed two weekend shifts (Dale's note).\n- \"A while ago\": Jorge says a coworker mentioned the schedule was unfair (reporter's account, no date).\n- Oct 19: Jorge emailed HR to ask about the process (email dated Oct 19).\n- Nov 2: Dale told Nikhil that the weekend assignments follow a rotation (Dale's account).\n- Jorge also says things changed \"after the summer\" (reporter's account, no date).\n\nNikhil's thoughts (do not include): \"Dale seems defensive, Jorge sounds sincere.\"","rules":[{"type":"maxWords","max":170},{"type":"plainText"}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Including undated items","why":"The AI adds 'A while ago' or 'after the summer'.","fix":"Say: \"Include only events that have a date.\"","checks":["r0"]},{"title":"Loaded wording","why":"The AI writes 'unfairly assigned'.","fix":"Say: \"Neutral sentences with no judgments or conclusions.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"Impressions","why":"The AI mentions Dale seeming defensive.","fix":"Say: \"Leave out the HR partner's impressions.\"","checks":["r2"]},{"title":"Missing final line","why":"The AI forgets the undated count.","fix":"Say: \"Finish with Undated items: N.\"","checks":["r2"]},{"title":"Trusting the AI to count words","why":"AI is bad at counting. Ask for a total word limit and it often lands over it.","fix":"Cap each part instead, for example: \"each line under 15 words.\"","checks":["maxWords"]},{"title":"Markdown","why":"The AI bolds words or adds headings.","fix":"Say: \"Plain text, no bold, no headings.\"","checks":["plainText"]}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Exact header","patterns":["date \\|","event \\|","source"]},{"label":"Dated only","patterns":["only events that have a date"]},{"label":"Neutral","patterns":["neutral","no judgments"]},{"label":"Undated line","patterns":["undated items"]},{"label":"Sort","patterns":["earliest first"]}],"hint":"Give the header, dated-only rule, the source values and the closing line.","mission":"Build a neutral timeline of dated events from the notes.","musts":["Dated events only","No judgments or labels","Undated items count"],"rubricLabels":["Has the header Date | Event | Source and rows only for dated events (Sep 14, Sep 22, Oct 6, Oct 19, Nov 2) sorted earliest first","Events are neutral one-sentence facts under 15 words with no judgments, and Source values are exactly Reporter, Manager or Email and correct (Sep 14 Email, Sep 22 Reporter, Oct 6 Manager, Oct 19 Email, Nov 2 Manager)","Ends with exactly the line \"Undated items: 2\" and includes none of Nikhil's impressions"]}