{"id":"hr-panel-feedback-debrief","audience":"hr","category":"meetings","track":"productivity","technique":"grounding","title":"Summarize panel feedback for the hiring debrief","free":false,"task":"You're prepping the hiring debrief from four interviewers' written feedback. Write exactly 4 numbered lines, one per interviewer in the order listed, each as 'Name: Hire or No hire - one job-related reason', plain text, under 70 words. Use each interviewer's final vote, and drop any comment that isn't about the job.","materialLabel":"Interviewer feedback (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"Debrief prep - Lin Park, Billing Analyst (Brightline Utilities)\n\nRaj (Finance Manager): Hire. Walked through a reconciliation of 3 mismatched accounts in 10 minutes, no errors.\n\nInes (Billing Lead): No hire at first - thought she was slow on the Excel exercise.\n  UPDATE (Ines, next morning): \"Re-checked her file; she found 2 errors in our sample data that I'd missed. Changing to Hire.\"\n\nMo (Senior Analyst): No hire. Couldn't explain how she'd prioritize month-end tasks when two deadlines collide. Also \"seemed quiet, maybe not a culture fit.\"\n\nHana (HR): Hire. Clear, specific answers on handling customer billing disputes; gave two real examples.\nHana also noted: \"She mentioned caring for her mom on weekends.\" (Not job-related; don't use.)\n\nDebrief rule: feedback must be job-related evidence; \"culture fit\" and personal details are not discussed.","rules":[{"type":"numberedItems","count":4},{"type":"maxWords","max":70},{"type":"plainText"}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Asking to 'summarize the feedback'","why":"The AI writes paragraphs per interviewer and its own recommendation.","fix":"Be exact: \"Exactly 4 numbered lines: 'Name: Hire or No hire - one reason'. Plain text.\"","checks":["numberedItems","plainText","r2"]},{"title":"Trusting the AI to count words","why":"AI is bad at counting. Ask for a total word limit and it often lands over it.","fix":"Cap each line instead: \"each line under 16 words.\"","checks":["maxWords"]},{"title":"Using the first vote","why":"Ines's first vote is No hire, and her update is below it.","fix":"Add: \"Use each interviewer's final vote. Ines changed to Hire.\"","checks":["r0"]},{"title":"Repeating non-job comments","why":"'Culture fit' and personal details are in the notes, and the AI may pass them on.","fix":"Add: \"Job-related reasons only. No culture fit, no personal details.\"","checks":["r1","r2"]}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Uses final votes","patterns":["final vote","update","ines.{0,20}hire","changed"]},{"label":"Job-related only","patterns":["job.related","culture fit","personal","evidence"]},{"label":"Shows the line shape","patterns":["name: hire","hire or no hire","like ['\"]?1\\."]},{"label":"Sets the number of lines","patterns":["\\b(4|four)\\b.{0,15}(line|interviewer)"]},{"label":"Asks for plain text","patterns":["plain","no bold","no markdown","no formatting","no headings"]}],"hint":"Debriefs should compare evidence, not impressions. Tell the AI to use final votes, the line shape, and that only job-related reasons count.","rubricLabels":["Lines are Raj Hire, Ines Hire (her updated vote, not No hire), Mo No hire, Hana Hire, in that order","Each reason is job-related evidence from the notes (reconciliation of 3 accounts; found 2 errors in sample data; couldn't explain month-end prioritization; real examples on billing disputes)","Contains no 'quiet', 'culture fit' or caring-for-her-mom detail, and has no overall recommendation, intro or tally"]}