{"id":"lead-okr-grading-meeting-notes-three-lines","audience":"product-managers","category":"leadership-work","track":"leadership","level":"beginner","technique":"audience","title":"Summarize a quarterly OKR grading meeting in three labeled lines","free":false,"task":"Summarize the OKR grading meeting for the team in exactly 3 plain-text lines labeled Wins:, Misses:, Next quarter:. Each line is one sentence under 25 words, uses the final scores, and names the owner in parentheses. Use 0.0 to 1.0 scores as written. Do not include objectives that were dropped.","materialLabel":"Grading meeting notes (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"Q3 OKR grading - Growth team\n\nKR1 Signups per week to 1,200: scored 0.9 (owner Jun).\nKR2 Activation rate to 45%: scored 0.4 (owner Pia). Pia said earlier 0.6, but the final score after data review was 0.4.\nKR3 Referral program launch: scored 1.0 (owner Sol).\nKR4 Reduce CAC to $80: scored 0.3 (owner Jun).\nKR5 Partner webinars: dropped mid-quarter (owner Sol); not graded.\n\nNext quarter decisions\n- Keep activation as the top KR and give it a second owner (Ravi) alongside Pia.\n- Stop the partner webinars for good.\n- CAC: carry over as a stretch KR.\nGeneral chat: the offsite food was great.","rules":[{"type":"maxWords","max":85},{"type":"plainText"},{"type":"numberedItems","count":0}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Using the early score","why":"The AI uses 0.6 for activation.","fix":"Say: \"Use the final score: 0.4.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"Grading a dropped KR","why":"The AI includes the webinars.","fix":"Say: \"Leave out the dropped KR.\"","checks":["r2"]},{"title":"Missing owners","why":"The AI omits who owned each KR.","fix":"Say: \"Name the owner in parentheses.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"Wrong structure","why":"The AI writes a list of five.","fix":"Say: \"Exactly three labeled lines.\"","checks":["r0"]},{"title":"Markdown and numbers","why":"The AI numbers and bolds.","fix":"Say: \"Plain text, no numbering.\"","checks":["plainText","numberedItems"]},{"title":"Trusting the AI to count words","why":"AI is bad at counting. Ask for a total word limit and it often lands over it.","fix":"Cap each line: \"each line under 25 words.\"","checks":["maxWords"]},{"title":"Trusting the AI to count words","why":"AI is bad at counting. Ask for a total word limit and it often lands over it.","fix":"Cap each part instead, for example: \"each line under 12 words.\"","checks":["maxWords"]}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Labels","patterns":["wins:","misses:","next quarter:"]},{"label":"Three lines","patterns":["3 lines","three lines"]},{"label":"Final scores","patterns":["final","score"]},{"label":"Owners","patterns":["owner","parentheses"]},{"label":"Dropped","patterns":["dropped","leave out"]}],"hint":"Give the three labels, the owner rule, and mention the correction and the dropped item.","rubricLabels":["The reply has exactly three lines labeled Wins:, Misses:, Next quarter: in that order","Wins cites the signups 0.9 (Jun) and referral launch 1.0 (Sol), and Misses cites activation at 0.4 (Pia, not 0.6) and CAC at 0.3 (Jun)","Next quarter mentions activation with Ravi added as a second owner, and does not include the partner webinars as a graded item"]}