{"id":"pm-risk-register-top-three","audience":"product-managers","category":"decisions","track":"data","technique":"format","title":"Write the top three open launch risks with owners","free":false,"task":"Your launch review needs the top open risks. Write exactly 3 numbered lines in the form 'Risk - High, Medium or Low - mitigation - owner', plain text, under 90 words, using the likelihood your team assigned. Skip the risk that's already resolved, and don't invent mitigations or owners.","materialLabel":"Risk notes (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"Launch risks - Group booking (Bookly), review Mar 12\n\n1. Double-booking bug in groups of 6+. Likelihood: High. Mitigation: cap groups at 5 for launch; fix in sprint 26. Owner: Omar.\n2. Help center articles late. Likelihood: Medium. Mitigation: Bea drafts by Mar 13; support reviews Mar 14. Owner: Bea.\n3. Payment provider rate limit during peak. Likelihood: Low. Mitigation: provider raised our limit 3x. Owner: Lena.\n   UPDATE Mar 10: provider confirmed the higher limit is live and tested. RESOLVED.\n4. Salons don't notice the feature. Likelihood: Medium. Mitigation: in-app banner for 2 weeks + launch email. Owner: Chris.\n\nNot risks (don't list): office move in April; Lena on PTO in May.","rules":[{"type":"numberedItems","count":3},{"type":"maxWords","max":90},{"type":"plainText"}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Asking for 'a risk list'","why":"The AI writes a table or a long risk section, adding its own risks.","fix":"Be exact: \"Exactly 3 numbered lines 'Risk - likelihood - mitigation - owner'. Plain text.\"","checks":["numberedItems","plainText","r2"]},{"title":"Trusting the AI to count words","why":"AI is bad at counting. Ask for a total word limit and it often lands over it.","fix":"Cap each line instead: \"each line under 22 words.\"","checks":["maxWords"]},{"title":"Listing resolved risks","why":"The payment risk is still in the list, with RESOLVED on a second line.","fix":"Add: \"Skip the payment risk; it's resolved.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"Changing your ratings","why":"The AI re-rates risks by its own judgment.","fix":"Add: \"Use the likelihood and owners from my notes. Invent nothing.\"","checks":["r0"]}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Shows the line shape","patterns":["risk - ","likelihood","mitigation","owner"]},{"label":"Skips resolved risks","patterns":["resolved","payment","skip"]},{"label":"Uses your ratings","patterns":["from my notes","don'?t (invent|change)","as assigned"]},{"label":"Sets the number of risks","patterns":["\\b(3|three)\\b.{0,15}risk"]},{"label":"Sets a word limit","patterns":["\\d+\\s*words","word (limit|count)"]}],"hint":"A risk list helps only if it's current and owned. Show the AI the line shape, tell it what's resolved, and to keep your ratings.","rubricLabels":["The 3 lines are the double-booking bug (High, cap groups at 5 / fix in sprint 26, Omar), late help center articles (Medium, Bea drafts by Mar 13 and support reviews Mar 14, Bea), and salons not noticing the feature (Medium, in-app banner plus launch email, Chris)","The resolved payment rate limit risk does not appear, and no non-risks (office move, PTO) appear","Each line follows 'Risk - likelihood - mitigation - owner' with nothing invented, and there is no intro or summary"]}