{"id":"prod2-pm-exec-summary-slide","audience":"product-managers","category":"presentations","track":"productivity","technique":"audience","title":"Build a one-slide exec summary with the ask first","free":false,"task":"Your VP gives you one slide in Monday's review. Write it as exactly 4 numbered lines with these labels in this order: Decision needed, Result, Cost, Risk. Each line is under 20 words, plain text, under 85 words in total. The VP only trusts the cleaned numbers, so use the lift figure after bot traffic was removed.","materialLabel":"Your pilot notes (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"Smart Reorder pilot - notes for Monday review\n\nWhat it is: a \"reorder in one tap\" button for repeat buyers in the Pantryline app. Pilot ran Aug 4 - Sep 28 in 2 regions (Midwest, Pacific NW), about 38,000 users.\n\nEarly dashboard (Sep 2): repeat orders up 18% vs control. Everyone got excited, a screenshot went into the sales deck.\n\nData team follow-up (Sep 30): about 1 in 6 \"repeat orders\" in the pilot group came from a bot load-test that was never switched off. After removing bot traffic, the real lift is 11% vs control. Still significant.\n\nOther numbers:\n- Average order value: flat ($46 both groups)\n- Support tickets about the button: 23, mostly \"where did my old cart go\"\n- Engineering cost to roll out everywhere: about $40,000 (2 engineers, 4 weeks)\n\nWhat we want: approval from the VP to expand Smart Reorder to the EU and APAC regions, starting Dec 1, so it's live before the holiday peak.\n\nRisks: EU needs a consent banner change (legal review ~2 weeks). If approval slips past Oct 31 we miss Dec 1.\n\nFun fact: the button color was chosen by a team vote, teal won 9-4.\n","rules":[{"type":"numberedItems","count":4},{"type":"maxWords","max":85},{"type":"plainText"}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Burying the ask","why":"The AI opens with background and puts the request at the end, if at all.","fix":"Add: \"Line 1 is 'Decision needed:' with the exact approval and date.\"","checks":["r0","r2"]},{"title":"Using the exciting number","why":"The 18% figure appears first and the AI repeats it.","fix":"Add: \"Use the 11% lift after bot traffic was removed. Don't use 18%.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"A slide full of text","why":"The AI writes a title, subtitle, and 8 bullets with bold labels.","fix":"Say: \"Exactly 4 numbered lines, each under 20 words, plain text.\"","checks":["numberedItems","plainText"]},{"title":"Trusting the AI to count words","why":"AI is bad at counting words, so a total word cap usually lands over.","fix":"Cap each line: \"each line under 15 words.\"","checks":["maxWords"]}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Names the labels","patterns":["decision needed","result.{0,30}cost.{0,30}risk"]},{"label":"Uses the cleaned number","patterns":["11","bot","cleaned","corrected"]},{"label":"Says who reads it","patterns":["\\bvp\\b","exec","leadership"]},{"label":"Sets the line count","patterns":["\\b(4|four)\\b.{0,15}lines?","numbered"]},{"label":"Caps the length","patterns":["\\d+\\s*words"]}],"hint":"Executives read the first line and maybe the second. Tell the AI exactly what the lines are, in what order, and which numbers are trustworthy.","rubricLabels":["The 4 lines are labeled, in this order: Decision needed, Result, Cost, Risk","Any lift figure given is 11% (after removing bot traffic); 18% is not presented as the result","The Decision needed line asks for approval to expand to the EU and APAC and mentions the Dec 1 start or the Oct 31 approval deadline"]}