{"id":"res-sales-territory-accounts-per-rep","audience":"sales","category":"research","technique":"verification","title":"Rank three territories on target accounts per rep","free":false,"task":"Your VP asked which of 3 cities to add a sales rep in, based on target accounts per current rep. You want exactly 3 numbered lines, one per city, each showing the math (like \"Tulsa: 240 / 2 = 120 per rep\"), then a final line starting \"Ranking:\" from most to fewest accounts per rep. Use the updated account counts where a later note changes them, use only the numbers in the notes, and output nothing else in plain text.","materialLabel":"Your territory notes (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"TERRITORY NOTES - where to add a rep in Q1 (for VP Hal Simmons)\nTarget accounts = dental and vet practices with 3+ locations\n\nBoise: 180 target accounts, 2 reps now\nSpokane: 150 target accounts, 1 rep now\nReno: 240 target accounts, 3 reps now\n\nUPDATE (Ops, Nov 2): After removing practices that closed or merged, Boise's target count is 132. Others unchanged.\n\nOther notes:\n- Spokane rep Kyle is out on leave until February, but still counts as a rep.\n- Reno had the best win rate last year (31%).\n- Hal said he \"has a feeling\" about Boise.","rules":[{"type":"numberedItems","count":3},{"type":"plainText"}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Using the old count","why":"Boise's 180 is listed first, and the AI may miss the Nov 2 update.","fix":"Say: \"Use the Nov 2 updated counts where they exist.\"","checks":["r0"]},{"title":"Not showing the math","why":"The AI states a ranking without numbers, so you can't check it.","fix":"Add: \"Show the math on each line, like 150 / 1 = 150.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"Adding other factors","why":"The AI weighs win rates and leave schedules, which changes the question you were asked.","fix":"Say: \"Rank only on accounts per rep. Output only the 3 lines.\"","checks":["r2"]},{"title":"Not saying how many","why":"The AI decides the length itself and usually returns more lines, one per city than you can use.","fix":"Be exact: \"exactly 3 numbered lines, one per city.\"","checks":["numberedItems"]},{"title":"Getting markdown back","why":"AI defaults to bold labels and headings, which show up as stray symbols in an email to your VP.","fix":"Ask for \"plain text, no bold, no headings.\"","checks":["plainText"]}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Uses the update","patterns":["update","nov(ember)?\\.? 2","132","latest"]},{"label":"Asks to show the math","patterns":["show (the |your )?math","/","divide","per rep"]},{"label":"Sets the ranking","patterns":["rank","most to fewest","highest","order"]},{"label":"Says exactly how many","patterns":["\\b(3|three)\\b.{0,25}(line|city|cities)","exactly \\d+"]},{"label":"Asks for plain text","patterns":["plain","no bold","no markdown","no formatting","no headings"]}],"hint":"A ranking is only as good as its inputs and its one criterion. Tell the AI which counts are current, the single measure to rank on, and to show the math.","rubricLabels":["The math is correct: Spokane 150 / 1 = 150, Reno 240 / 3 = 80, Boise 132 / 2 = 66 (using the updated 132, not 180)","The Ranking line orders the cities Spokane, Reno, Boise (most to fewest per rep), and each numbered line shows its math","Outputs only the 3 numbered lines and the Ranking line: no intro, no recommendation paragraph, no mention of win rates or Hal's feeling"]}