{"id":"revops-activity-vs-benchmark-flags-table","audience":"managers","category":"sales-work","technique":"verification","track":"sales","level":"intermediate","title":"Compare rep activity to benchmarks and flag the metric below 80%","free":false,"task":"Make a markdown table with columns Rep | Calls % | Emails % | Meetings % | Below 80%, one row per rep. Each percent is the rep's weekly count divided by the benchmark, rounded to a whole number and written like 85%. Below 80% lists the metric names under 80% (strictly less than 80%), or None. No bold and nothing outside the table. Under 80 words.","materialLabel":"Weekly activity vs benchmark (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"Weekly activity benchmarks for AEs: calls 60; emails 120; meetings 8.\n\nWeek ending Nov 6 2026, actual counts:\nRep Ahmed: calls 48; emails 130; meetings 6\nRep Beatriz: calls 66; emails 90; meetings 8\nRep Chen: calls 30; emails 100; meetings 9\n\nNotes:\n- Rule: a metric is flagged only if it is strictly under 80% of benchmark; exactly 80% is not flagged.\n- Chen was out Monday for a medical appointment (calendar shows); do not adjust the benchmark.\n- Last year's benchmarks (calls 50; emails 100; meetings 6) are retired.\n- Meetings means held meetings with prospects, not scheduled.","rules":[{"type":"plainText"},{"type":"maxWords","max":80}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Flagging exactly 80%","why":"The AI flags Ahmed's calls.","fix":"Add: \"Flag only strictly under 80%.\"","checks":["r2"]},{"title":"Using old benchmarks","why":"The AI uses the retired numbers.","fix":"Add: \"Use the current benchmarks.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"Adjusting for absence","why":"The AI changes Chen's benchmark.","fix":"Add: \"Do not adjust the benchmark.\"","checks":["r1","r2"]},{"title":"Extra commentary","why":"The AI writes coaching advice.","fix":"Add: \"Nothing outside the table, no bold.\"","checks":["r0","plainText","maxWords"]}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Names the columns","patterns":["rep","calls %","emails %","meetings %","below 80%"]},{"label":"Defines percent","patterns":["divided by","benchmark"]},{"label":"States the strict rule","patterns":["strictly","under 80%","exactly 80%"]},{"label":"Uses current benchmarks","patterns":["current","retired","last year"]},{"label":"Table only","patterns":["nothing outside","no bold"]}],"hint":"Define the percent, the strict 80% rule and ask for only the table.","rubricLabels":["Is a table with columns Rep, Calls %, Emails %, Meetings % and Below 80% with exactly three rows for Ahmed, Beatriz and Chen","Percents are Ahmed 80%, 108%, 75%; Beatriz 110%, 75%, 100%; Chen 50%, 83%, 113%","Below 80% lists Meetings for Ahmed (calls at exactly 80% is not flagged), Emails for Beatriz and Calls for Chen, with no bold and no text outside the table"]}