{"id":"wri-hs-lab-conclusion-checklist","audience":"high-school","category":"writing-feedback","technique":"verification","title":"Check your lab conclusion against the claim-evidence checklist","free":false,"task":"Before turning in your chemistry lab, check your conclusion against your teacher's checklist. Ask for exactly 3 lines labeled 'Claim:', 'Evidence:' and 'Reasoning:', each starting with 'Yes' or 'No' and then one sentence on why, checked against your data table. No rewritten conclusion and nothing else. Write a prompt that gets that check.","materialLabel":"Your data table and draft conclusion (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"CHEM LAB 6 - Temperature and Reaction Rate (Alka-Seltzer in water)\nQuestion: How does water temperature affect how fast the tablet dissolves?\n\nDATA TABLE (dissolving time in seconds)\nWater temp | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Average\n10 C       | 72      | 70      | 74      | 72\n25 C       | 45      | 47      | 43      | 45\n40 C       | 30      | 29      | 31      | 30\n55 C       | 21      | 22      | 52*     | 32\n* Trial 3 at 55 C: tablet was broken in half before dropping. Ms. Novak said to leave it out, so the 55 C average without it is 21.5.\n\nMY DRAFT CONCLUSION\nAs the water temperature increased, the tablet dissolved faster. For example, at 55 C the average dissolving time was 32 seconds, compared to 72 seconds at 10 C. This happens because the tablet is more excited in hot water.\n\nTEACHER'S CHECKLIST\n- Claim: answers the question directly.\n- Evidence: uses correct data from the table, including any corrections.\n- Reasoning: explains WHY using particles (molecules move faster and collide more often/with more energy).","rules":[{"type":"plainText"}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Asking \"is this good?\"","why":"The AI praises the conclusion and suggests general tweaks.","fix":"Show it: \"Exactly 3 lines: Claim: Yes/No - why. Evidence: ... Reasoning: ...\"","checks":["r0"]},{"title":"Not checking the data","why":"The AI accepts the 32-second average without noticing it includes the bad trial.","fix":"Add: \"Check the evidence against my data table, including Ms. Novak's correction.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"Getting a rewrite","why":"AI hands you a polished conclusion, which isn't your work anymore.","fix":"Add: \"Don't rewrite it. Just Yes or No and why.\"","checks":["r2"]},{"title":"Forgetting where it gets pasted","why":"AI adds bold and headings by default, which show up as ** and # clutter in your notes.","fix":"Add: \"Plain text, no bold, no headings.\"","checks":["plainText"]}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Uses the checklist labels","patterns":["claim","evidence","reasoning"]},{"label":"Asks for Yes or No","patterns":["yes or no","yes/no"]},{"label":"Checks the data","patterns":["data table","21\\.5","correction","trial 3"]},{"label":"Bans a rewrite","patterns":["don'?t rewrite","no rewrit","not (a )?rewrite","only the"]},{"label":"Asks for plain text","patterns":["plain","no bold","no markdown","no formatting","no headings"]}],"hint":"A checklist review tells you exactly what to fix yourself. Give the AI the labels, the Yes/No format and the data to check against.","rubricLabels":["Has exactly 3 lines labeled 'Claim:', 'Evidence:' and 'Reasoning:', in that order, each starting with Yes or No, with nothing before or after them","Claim is Yes; Evidence is No because it uses the 32-second average at 55 C, which includes the broken-tablet trial (it should be 21.5 seconds)","Reasoning is No because 'the tablet is more excited' doesn't explain particle motion (faster-moving molecules colliding more), and the reply does not rewrite the conclusion"]}