{"id":"wri-np-board-report-feedback","audience":"nonprofit","category":"writing-feedback","technique":"verification","title":"Check a board report summary against the program data","free":false,"task":"Your program director's board report summary goes out Monday. Ask for a check against the program data: exactly 3 numbered lines, each starting 'Accurate', 'Inaccurate' or 'Missing', and giving the data in under 20 words. Then one final line starting 'Lead with:' naming the one number the board should see first. Plain text, no rewritten summary. Write a prompt that gets that check.","materialLabel":"The draft summary and program data (attached to your prompt automatically)","material":"DRAFT BOARD SUMMARY (Q3, Youth Mentoring Program)\nQ3 was our best quarter ever! We matched 85 new mentor pairs, and nearly all of our matches are still going strong. Volunteer interest is way up. We also stayed on budget.\n\nPROGRAM DATA (Q3, from the database)\n- New matches: 58. (85 was the number of mentor APPLICATIONS, not matches.)\n- Match retention at 12 months: 81% (goal: 75%).\n- Volunteer applications: 85, up from 52 in Q2.\n- Budget: $4,200 over for Q3 (background check fees rose in July).\n- Waitlist: 37 youth waiting for a mentor, up from 22.","rules":[{"type":"numberedItems","count":3},{"type":"plainText"}],"mistakes":[{"title":"Asking for a polish","why":"The AI makes the summary sound better and keeps the wrong numbers.","fix":"Show it: \"Exactly 3 numbered lines starting Accurate, Inaccurate or Missing.\"","checks":["numberedItems","r0"]},{"title":"Not checking the data","why":"The AI accepts '85 new pairs' because it can't know 85 was applications.","fix":"Add: \"Check every claim against the program data.\"","checks":["r1"]},{"title":"No clear lead, or a rewrite","why":"Without a 'lead with' line, the director still won't know what matters most.","fix":"Add: \"End with Lead with: and one number. No rewrite. Plain text.\"","checks":["r2","plainText"]}],"promptHints":[{"label":"Gives the verdict labels","patterns":["accurate","inaccurate","missing"]},{"label":"Checks the data","patterns":["program data","check","against","database"]},{"label":"Asks for a lead number","patterns":["lead with","first"]},{"label":"Bans a rewrite","patterns":["don'?t rewrite","no rewrit","not (a )?rewrite","only the"]},{"label":"Asks for plain text","patterns":["plain","no bold","no markdown","no formatting","no headings"]}],"hint":"Board members remember the first number they see. Ask the AI to check each claim with fixed labels and to name the lead.","rubricLabels":["Each of the 3 numbered lines starts with 'Accurate', 'Inaccurate' or 'Missing' and gives the data","Marks the 85 new matches as Inaccurate (58 matches; 85 was applications) and 'stayed on budget' as Inaccurate ($4,200 over), and the third line covers retention (81% vs a 75% goal) or the missing waitlist of 37 youth","The last line starts with 'Lead with:' and names one specific number (such as 81% retention or the 37-youth waitlist), and there is no rewritten summary"]}